Since the most important asset allocation decision is the allocation between stocks and fixed-income (fixed-income is cash and bonds), the stock/fixed-income allocation is presented first for each portfolio; this is referred to as the top level allocation. Then, the stock and fixed-income allocations are further subdivided into lower level asset classes. By stocks I actually mean mutual funds that invest in stocks, and by bonds I mean mutual funds that invest in bonds. By cash I mean savings accounts, CDs, money market accounts, and similar cash-like assets.
In this post, I'll simply present the portfolios. In subsequent posts, I'll discuss the stories behind the portfolios; i.e., the design, construction, maintenance and performance of the portfolios.
Portfolio 1: Simple, aggressive, global equity portfolio
Investor: 20-25 year old individual
Investment horizon: 40-70 years
- Top level allocation
- 100% Stocks
- 0% Fixed-Income
- Stock Allocation (100% of portfolio)
- 50% Vanguard Total Stock Market Index (US stocks)
- 50% Vanguard Total International Stock Index (non-US stocks)
Portfolio 2: Simple, moderately conservative portfolio
Investor: younger retired couple
Investment horizon: 20-30 years
- Top level allocation
- 40% Stocks
- 60% Fixed-Income
- Stock Allocation (40% of portfolio)
- 65% US (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF)
- 35% International (Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF)
- Fixed Income Allocation (60% of portfolio)
- 80% Bonds (Vanguard Short-Term Investment-Grade Bond, Vanguard Intermediate-Term Investment-Grade Bond)
- 20% Cash (Vanguard Prime Money Market and savings/checking accounts)
Portfolio 3: Moderately complex, conservative portfolio
Investor: older retired couple
Investment horizon: 10-15 years
- Top level allocation
- 20% Stocks
- 80% Fixed-Income
- Stock Allocation (20% of portfolio)
- 60% US
- 80% Vanguard Total Stock Market Index (US stocks)
- 20% Vanguard REIT Index (US Real Estate Investment Trust stocks)
- 40% International
- 75% Vanguard Developed Markets Index
- 25% Emerging Markets Index
- Fixed Income Allocation (80% of portfolio)
- 40% Bonds (Vanguard Short-Term Investment-Grade Bond, Vanguard Intermediate-Term Investment-Grade Bond, Vanguard Inflation-Protected Securities fund, and a few others)
- 60% Cash (Rewards checking account, high yield online savings account, money market accounts)
Note that as we get into more complex asset allocations, as above, I break down each sub-asset class so that the components equal 100%. I prefer to think about a sub-asset class as a percentage of its "parent" asset class, rather than as a percentage of the total portfolio. For example, t
Portfolio 4: Moderately complex, aggressive, global portfolio
Investor: high school age individual
Investment horizon: 50-80 years
- Top level allocation
- 80% stocks
- 20% fixed-income
- Stock Allocation (50% of portfolio)
- 50% US
- 50% Total Stock Market Index or Large Cap Stock Index (large blend)
- 25% Value Index (large value)
- 25% Small Cap Index (small blend)
- 50% International
- 75% Developed Markets
- 25% Emerging Markets
- Fixed-income allocation (20% of portfolio)
- 80% bonds (Vanguard Intermediate-Term Investment-Grade Bond)
- 20% cash (money market and rewards checking account)
Also, I want to note that the international portion could be in only the Vanguard Total International Stock fund, since this fund currently has about 75% developed markets and 25% emerging markets. However, the actual portfolio also holds the Developed Markets Index and Emerging Markets Index. One reason is tax loss harvesting, but another reason is that it enables rebalancing the portfolio to the target 75%/25% mix of developed and emerging markets if the percentage of emerging markets in the Total International fund diverges significantly from our 25% target.
Portfolio 5: Complex, aggressive portfolio
Investor: 25 year old individual
Investment horizon: 40-70 years:
- Top level allocation
- 80% stocks
- 20% fixed income
- Stock allocation (80% of portfolio)
- 60% US
- 55% large blend
- 15% large value
- 15% small blend
- 15% small value
- 40% International
- 60% developed markets
- 25% emerging markets
- 15% international small blend
- Fixed-income allocation (20% of portfolio)
- 100% cash (rewards checking account)
Under stock allocation, I forget what the difference is between "blend" and "value." For example, small blend and small value. What are these? I would love any expansion on portfolio 5...
ReplyDeleteNice to see some comments!
ReplyDeleteValue is a term for stocks of companies that aren't growing quickly, or for some other reason, are not highly valued. Growth is a term for companies that are growing quickly, and are highly valued. Blend is in the middle. For more on this, see Asset Allocation Part 2 from January 2010.
I plan to go into details on all of the portfolios, but will work through them in order, so it may be awhile before I get to portfolio 5.
Thank you for all this great information. It is exactly the information I need.
ReplyDeletenice
ReplyDeleteSo, Kevin myself and my wife are 72 and 67. Our spending is covered by SS, pension and returns (if any) on our portfolio. We don't need to touch the principal. I am thinking that we could go with Portfolio 4 or 5 in our situation, even though these are targeted to younger investors. Agree?
ReplyDeleteSure, as long as you really have the willingness to take that much risk; i.e., would be OK seeing the value of your portfolio drop 40% or more, not knowing how long it would take to recover.
DeleteYour situation is not that atypical. You have high ability to take risk, but low need to take risk, so you could go with anywhere from 0% to 100% stocks, and probably be OK. You can use your willingness to take risk to dial it in.
Another way to look at it is that you're investing your portfolio more for your heirs than for yourselves. From this perspective, your investment horizon could be much longer than your expected lifetimes, for example if your children are your heirs.
I am in a similar situation, but I learned a lot about my willingness to take risk in 2008/2009, so I go with only a 30% target allocation to stocks. I would consider increasing that if we had another severe bear market, and I found that my willingness to take risk was then higher than it was in 2008/2009.
Here's a post I did on ability, willingness and need to take risk, a framework I learned about from Larry Swedroe: http://www.kevinoninvesting.com/2010/04/risk-tolerance.html.
Based on my experience with my family and friends since I published this post, I now lean toward simpler portfolios for most people--something like a 3-fund portfolio, using a total US stock fund, a total international stock fund, and a bond fund.
I personally currently prefer using a combination of CDs and Treasuries for the fixed-income portion, but this is more complicated, and perhaps not appropriate for most people.